Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 1484 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4160T - 167 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |