Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 464 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Starfield than Athlon 3000G - 55 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
81.10169491525424%
Multi-Core
1975
27.35078244010525%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
| Colfax | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 250 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
