Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 235 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 178 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |