Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1583 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 23% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1840 - 175 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 53 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
