Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1210 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 26% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 93 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £70.00 vs £300.09
- Up to 82% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.75 vs £4.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 58 vs 180 Watts
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for £300.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
93
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |