Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 1279 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5500 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 115 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £84.00 vs £300.09
- Up to 74% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.73 vs £2.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £300.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
115
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Colfax | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |