Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 219 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron G3930 - 158 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
153
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Whitehaven | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |