Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1062 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 20% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 199 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for £603.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
67.72700983227298%
Multi-Core
7539
75.16450648055833%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |