Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2290 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 207 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - £49.95 vs £929.89
- Up to 94% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen 9 7900X - £0.28 vs £4.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £929.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
179
86%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |