Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1919 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-7900X - 135 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - £339.0 vs £428.88
- Up to 37% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-7900X - £2.51 vs £4.01 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7900X - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |