Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2947 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 91% better in Starfield than FX-8320E - 84 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 7900X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
| Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
