Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3046 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 59% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-8320E - 94 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
