Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 2028 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7900X - 159 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - £339.98 vs £428.88
- Up to 35% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7900X - £2.14 vs £3.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7900X - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
159
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£339.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £339.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |