Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 6900HX outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 6900HX is 629 days newer than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i9-10900F - 204 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX - 20 vs 16 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
99%
Value, £/FPS
£1.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£325
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6543 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rembrandt | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |