Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900HX outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900HX is 2815 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6350 - 185 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Cezanne | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |