Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 668 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 231 vs 197 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Renoir | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |