Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 319 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-9100F - 295 vs 293 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
94.75862068965517%
Multi-Core
3669
57.444809769844994%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |