Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 328 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100F - 190 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
187
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |