Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 3078 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 278 vs 249 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Renoir | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |