Buy on Amazon
£235.38
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1620 - 140 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£235.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 3 GHz - 8 Cores - 16 Threads - 96 MB Cache Memory - Socket AM4 - OEM
Buy for £235.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
