Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3340 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1620 - 147 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £66.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1558 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
18.382022471910112%
Multi-Core
723
9.69558803808502%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |