Buy on Amazon
£215
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $250
Availability
MSRP in USD: $250
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Core i5-7440HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 915 days newer than Core i5-7440HQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 8% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-7440HQ - 185 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7440HQ - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7440HQ
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Ryzen 7 3800X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£215
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Processor (8C/16T, 36 MB Cache, 4.5 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4861 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Ryzen 7 3800X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i5-7440HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | vs | Intel Core i5-7440HQ |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Ryzen 7 3800X or Core i5-7440HQ
Resident Evil 4, 1920 x 1080, Max
64 FPS
£19.67/FPS
Radeon RX 6600
Ryzen 7 3800X
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£1,259
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
