Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 107 days newer than Ryzen 7 3750H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves than Ryzen 7 3750H - 164 vs 161 FPS
Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
164
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |