Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3750H outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3750H is 1862 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G1820 - 131 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3750H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
