Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 252 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 170 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - £99.99 vs £230.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 24 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74001 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
99.41176470588235%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£99.99
100%
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74002 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
94.29718875502007%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |