Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 493 days older than Ryzen 7 2700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 7 2700U - 269 vs 262 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
269
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 2700U
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
