Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 993 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Athlon 3000G - 237 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - £60.0 vs £250.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 1700 - £0.25 vs £1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Athlon |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |