Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1002 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 229 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£424.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £424.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |