Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 194 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 15 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 29% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 388 vs 300 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 20 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
388
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£570
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Picasso | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |