Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 478 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 142 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.71/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |