Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2268 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than FX-8350 - 83 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
