Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900KF - 144 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £126.99 vs £270.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900KF - £0.88 vs £1.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
144
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£126.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £126.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6218 minutes ago
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Vermeer | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |