Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 2758 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 163 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
156
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 5600GT | vs | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Not Available | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |