Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600HS outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600HS is 2590 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Performs up to 57% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1610 - 110 vs 70 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 4600HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Renoir | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
