Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 135 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - £49.99 vs £186.83
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £186.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77740 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
37.028014616321556%
Multi-Core
1043
14.899999999999999%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |