Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 741 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - £64.99 vs £450.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-7900X - £0.24 vs £1.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 276 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
270
97.82608695652173%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£64.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
276
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
14.723926380368098%
Price, £
£450
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
79.32489451476793%
Multi-Core
3619
41.21398473977907%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |