Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £81.34 vs £158.88
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-10600K - £0.2 vs £0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3400G - 427 vs 401 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
401
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£81.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £81.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18104 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
427
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
54%
Price, £
£158.88
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |