Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1052 days older than Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 5 2600 - 176 vs 175 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris Pro P6300 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
