Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1691 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-4300M - 525 vs 518 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i5-4300M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i5-4300M |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 37 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
