Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 405 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 23% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3930 - 316 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
256
81%
Value, £/FPS
£0.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |