Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1897 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 34% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 194 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 55 vs 65 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
