Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1938 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6300 - 168 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |