Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1649 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 15 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 25% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3250U - 180 vs 144 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
180
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |