Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 668 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 3250U - 222 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |