Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 691 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 15 vs 62 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 78% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 3 3250U - 151 vs 85 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 62 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |