Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200U is 1711 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1840 - 172 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 15 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
151
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |