Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2979 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6200 - 129 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
