Buy on Amazon
£49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 615 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 10% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3930 - 229 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 2300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
50.45643153526971%
Multi-Core
1043
31.56779661016949%
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
