Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Ryzen 3 2300U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 235 days newer than Ryzen 3 2300U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 2300U - 529 vs 513 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300U - 32 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2300U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
