Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 843 days newer than Ryzen 3 2200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Apex Legends than Ryzen 3 2200U - 280 vs 263 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 2200U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
